I don't actually work with ADFFaces/Trinidad, but commandButton must
implement ActionSource.
By the way, that definition includes almost everything :-)
These kinds of problems are generally due to using a request-scoped
bean attribute for your table's value attribute. An easy test is to
make the bean session-scoped and see if that causes the problem to
disappear. If so, you need to use t:saveState or the equivalent in
Trinidad to persist the bean across requests.
On 9/14/06, Piyush Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to contain a <tr:commandButton> within a <tr:table> ?
As per the documentation, <tr:table> should have a <tr:column> as its
immediate child and only certain types of components are supported as children inside a
Column. Supported components include all components with no behaviour and most components
that implement the EditableValueHolder or ActionSource interfaces.
I tried putting a commandButton within a column like this:
<tr:table>
<tr:column>
<f:facet name="header">
<tr:outputText value="Action"/>
</f:facet>
<tr:commandButton id="commandButton1" text="Button1" />
</tr:column>
</tr:table>
...and it did not work. Please advise.
Regards,
Piyush
