Hi,
I use trinidad for few month now, and you shouldn't be afraid of
"incubator milestone" status.
I think major refactoring is already done (package, components, tag
renaming, .........), and there will be only minor changes.
My current experience of Trinidad with my web applications is that,
actual codebase, is stable and has no major issue. I think M1 version of
trinidad should be released soon and will be like a "production quality"
release.
I have choosen Trinidad because in my opinion there are no equivalent
open source JSF components libs, Trinidad represent an amazing job, lots
of components, with rich features, easy to use, skinable and so on, ...
I needed to write entirely dynamic application. (form with dynamic input
types (switcher) and dynamic number of field, table with dynamic
columns, .....)
Tobago and Tomahawk are too limited for that compared to Trinidad.
On 9/14/06, Ganesh Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are currently in the process of switching over to JSF and a
suitable JSF component library. Our biggest challenge is choosing a
suitable
JSF component library out of MyFaces Tomahawk, MyFaces Tobago and
MyFaces
Trinidad. Please could you guys throw some clarity on the following
issues,
1. is it absolutely necessary that we choose one of these three
libraries ?
1. are these three component libraries going to be merged into one
library ?
2. if you recommend Trinidad, is it a good idea to start using Trinidad
right away ? In other words do you foresee a lot of changes being
committed
to the codebase in the next few months ? We are currently in the
process of
prototyping; so it would be perfectly okay for us to use Trinidad as
long as
your plan is to release a production-ready version of Trinidad in the
next
1-2 months.
