go ahead, sounds good! logged it to Jira http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-198
-M On 9/26/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any comments, anyone? I'm getting close to implementing this... -- Adam On 9/22/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've checked in the first big part of getting ready for public rendering > APIs. > The goal is to move APIs out of trinidad-impl and into trinidad-api, but > a number of the desired APIs pulled in a lot of code that really shouldn't > > be made public. So, a bunch of refactoring was called for, introducing > some pure abstract base classes with reduced functionality, or sometimes > just eliminating dependencies altogether. > > My planned next step is to move the following APIs over, with > proposed package names (all under org.apache.myfaces.trinidad, > of course) > > * render.RenderingContext > * render.PartialPageContext > * render.LocaleContext > * render.FormData > * skin.Skin > * skin.Icon > > Option 2 I can think of is to use context.RenderingContext instead > of render.RenderingContext (and likewise for all the first four). > > After that, the only classes I'm itching to make public are CoreRenderer > and RenderUtils, both of which would go into o.a.m.t.render. After > that, I can think of a bunch of candidates, like some of the output > utility functions in core.xhtml, maybe RenderKitDecorator, etc., > but we can take those on more slowly. > > Comments? > > -- Adam > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
