On 9/27/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My opinion is just that this should be decided tag-by-tag, not globally. If it makes sense for a tag to have only one message, do that. If it makes sense to have two, do that. Class inheritance should not be used as the reason for doing this. (Especially so for the validatiors and converters in Trinidad that already extend from JSF spec validators and converters, where the base class is out of our hands.)
I think we all agree on this. My suggestion is that the "one tag" should have an identical name whenever possible rather than many similarly-named tags. I see the ability to handle this in a superclass as an additional perk, not as a supporting reason. I regret that I brought it up as I think it's distracted us from the real discussion.
