Yeah, as soon as Tomahawk 1.1.5 is done, there'll be quite some 1.2 work going on. I promise.
regards, Martin On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am fine with that, also w/ using RI 1.2 instead of MyFaces. On the 1.2 is not much work going on. I hope that changes soon ;) -M On 9/28/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Re-sending; it bounced the first time) > > My bosses at work are starting to request a JSF 1.2-based version > of Trinidad, so I'd like to get started on that. What I'm thinking of: > > - A branch off the trunk (not on trunk) > - Depending on the 1.2 RI, 'cause 1.2 isn't available yet > - I'll file a JIRA issue for this. > > I wish it could be based on MyFaces, but 1.2 isn't there yet, > and I wish I had time to help out on MyFaces 1.2, but I don't... :( > > My assumption is that this won't be the final 1.2 branch - instead > of regular merges from trunk onto this branch, it'll probably > be easier to create new 1.2 branches and merge the 1.2 > work onto that. Or, to be more brief, I'm assuming that we > won't bother having anyone check patches into both > branches, at least for now - we'll just do 1.2 work on the 1.2 > branch, and occasionally create new 1.2 branches to > pull in all the latest patches. > > How's this sound? > > -- Adam > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
