I agree. XSS was the original format, but then we added the CSS-format
skinning file thinking that it will be more understandable to a person that
would be in charge of the skinning; i.e., someone with css experience.
There are features in XSS that aren't yet in CSS, so we should port
those over before we kill it. The base skins, like simple/minimal ar
using xss.
Adam Winer wrote:
I agree - while I've got nothing against accepting patches to the
XSS code, ideally the XSS code can die ASAP...
-- Adam
On 11/24/06, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Personally, I hope we'll let it die, especially since inhibit was
added to
CSS format.
On 11/24/06, Mark Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've found a bug in the XSS skinning engine. Specifically, it doesn't
> recognize Icon descriptors while the CSS skinner does. Right now I'm
> working on a patch the fix this, but my question is, what is the
future
> of XSS support? Ie, is it going away?
>
> Mark
>
