Right, thanks. Dan
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: release plan this is first on the release plan. after we have released a m1 of trinidad (core and plugins), we can start on talking again about getting out of incubator. A release is a proof of being able to develop a product in the open source manner ;) -M On 1/15/07, Daniel Hannum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are we talking about a release plan to get out of incubator? Or a > release plan to release the next snapshot? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matthias Wessendorf > Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 1:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: release plan > > yes! > thanks. that is much more detailed than my old proposal. I put it > together in a wiki page > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TrinidadReleasePlans > > > > On 1/13/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And, I'd love to have the JSF 1.2 version released too - plugins > > and Trinidad itself - 'cause that's what I'm spending most of > > my time working with these days. > > > > I think that the full process for release should be: > > > > FOR PLUGINS: > > - Create m1 branch of plugins > > - Update version in POM of plugins trunk to m2-SNAPSHOT > > - Vote on releasing plugins, if approved by incubator, then: > > - Update version in POMs of m1 branch to remove SNAPSHOT > > - Release plugins > > > > BETWEEN THE PLUGINS AND TRINIDAD: > > - Update Trinidad trunk to point at m1, non-snapshot plugins *or* > > to m2-SNAPSHOT, depending on how confident we are > > > > FOR TRINIDAD: > > - create m1 branch of Trinidad > > - Update version in POM of Trinidad trunk to m2-SNAPSHOT > > - Vote on releasing Trinidad, if approved by incubator > > - Update version in POMs of m1 branch to remove SNAPSHOT > > - Release Trinidad > > > > These'll be consecutive, but in the future should in theory > > be totally disconnected. > > > > How's this sound? > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > On 1/12/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, thanks Matthias for opening the thread. As you point out, we > will > > > need > > > to have the jsf 1.2 maven-faces-plugin released when the jsf myfaces > > > implementation is ready. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > On 12/01/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have the following release plan in mind: > > > > > > > > -getting the JSF 1.1 plugins release out > > > > (needs approval by the Incubator PMC) > > > > -making Trinidad core (the /trinidad folder) depend on them and > deploy > > > > a RC for the M1 of core > > > > -getting the JSF 1.1 core release out > > > > (needs approval by the Incubator PMC) > > > > > > > > doing the same procedure for the JSF 1.2 bits. Why JSF 1.2? > Because > > > > your friends at MyFaces currently working on JSF 1.2 release and > at > > > > least they need a *release* version of the JSF 1.2 plugins to get > a > > > > RC1 out for that. An Apache policy says "no -SNAPSHOT > dependencies" in > > > > a release. > > > > > > > > comments? > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
