resent, because went to PMC list.....
On 2/3/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi guys,
currently our stuff has no real version number; only M1, which is
almost nothing.
I think we should name the current Trinidad stuff 1.0.0 and put the m1
(or incubator or incubating) to it, because of being incubator (for
plugins and core).
So something like:
<version>incubator-m1-SNAPSHOT</version>
would be:
<version>1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
The "incubating" I saw, when looking at OpenJPA.
(of course w/o SNAPSHOT, after we do a release)
For the JSF 1.2 branch I suggest to use the version 2.0
I think it doesn't make sense to follow the JSF version system in the
version system of us.
So, according to some blog entries, the next version for JSF (targeted
for Java EE 6), will be called JSF 6. That would mean, if we stay
tightly with their system we'd have a release or
Trinidad 1.0 (mustn't it be 1.1 ??)
Trinidad 1.2
Trinidad 6
which is really confusing (to me).
So, to sum it up:
-the current Trinidad stuff (based on JSF 1.1) will be 1.0.0
-the *future* stuff (based on JSF 1.2) will be the 2.0.0 stuff
-In case of JSF 6, we simply have a 3.0.0.
-using "$version-incubating" instead of "$version-m1"
Any comments ?
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
