Sweet :) Mvgr, Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Iona's Daniel Kulp gave me a hint on the maven list, regarding the javadoc. > > a very nice plugin: > In the "maven-plugin-parent" pom, you can add the following snippet, then > you can actually REMOVE the META-INF/LICENSE and > META-INF/INCUBATOR_NOTICE.txt files from your source tree. (You can > optionally remove the NOTICE files as well as this will create new ones > based > on the dependencies. However, if the NOTICE file is left, it will use it > instead of creating a new one.) > > <plugin> > <artifactId>maven-remote-resources-plugin</artifactId> > <version>1.0-alpha-2</version> > <executions> > <execution> > <goals> > <goal>process</goal> > </goals> > <configuration> > <resourceBundles> > <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-jar-resource-bundle:1.1</resourceBundle> > <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle:1.0</resourceBundle> > > </resourceBundles> > <properties> > <addLicense>true</addLicense> > <preProjectText>Put the Oracle thing here in > a cdata section type of thing. > </preProjectText> > </properties> > </configuration> > </execution> > </executions> > </plugin> > > > > > I already *replaced* the stuff in the stage. > So now, all your concerns are fixed (the last was the javadoc-jar) > > -M > > On 2/21/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The javadoc things sucks.. We probably can get it work (to add notice, >> etc), but at a high cost I >> think (at least I couldn't get the simplest solution working, which is >> adding files to >> src/main/javadoc) (another note : for once I didn't look at the >> sourcecode how stuff works). >> >> So from me +1 (I didn't check every single artifact, just a >> "snapshot") of what was in the staging >> environment. >> >> And about the vote : you have to start it on general :) Just do a VOTE >> RESULT first here (specify >> who voted, if the person is on the PPMC or/and on the Incubator PMC >> (and also result the votes of >> people who don't have a binding vote (since they are worth something). >> >> If Craig also casts his vote and one other person (like Robert) we can >> really release this baby and >> start with releasing the core :) >> >> Yeeha :) >> >> Mvgr, >> Martin >> >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> > btw. the javadoc jar issue is triggered by a bug inside of the plugin. >> > >> > Martin, >> > do you bring the vote up to [EMAIL PROTECTED], once you voted +1 :) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Matthias >> > >> > On 2/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ok, Martin I fixed those things >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/ >> >> >> >> Once we get the approval from the Incubator PMC guys, I'd like to >> >> test/use this tool for doing the copy: >> >> >> >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Repository+Tools >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> On 2/19/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Sorry for the delay (board report time).. >> >> > >> >> > - Source jar contains target directory (probably need to do an >> >> exclude of that specifically) >> >> > - Source jar src/site don't contain licenses >> >> > - Javadoc jar don't contain any notices and license (since javadoc >> >> is generated the html doesn't >> >> > need apache headers) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Not blocking : >> >> > >> >> > In the MANIFEST.MF file I am missing the version of the plugin (for >> >> the trinidad core a lot more >> >> > important) and also the build version is 1.5. Don't know if that is >> >> the target / needed ? (afaik >> >> > trinidad core is 1.5) >> >> > >> >> > If you fix the source and javadoc I am +1 :) >> >> > >> >> > Sorry for the tough crowd. On the other hand : if you get it right >> >> once, you should be able to get >> >> > it right everywhere :) >> >> > >> >> > Mvgr, >> >> > Martin >> >> > >> >> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >> > > Hi, >> >> > > >> >> > > I finally managed to get some release artifacts published to a >> "stage >> >> > > repo". I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). >> >> > > >> >> > > Please take a look at the "1.0.0-incubating" artifacts and vote >> if we >> >> > > should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval >> >> > > >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------ >> >> > > [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only >> >> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >> >> > > [ ] +0 >> >> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be >> >> released, >> >> > > and why.............. >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------ >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks, >> >> > > Matthias >> >> > > >> >> > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/ >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh >> >> >> >> further stuff: >> >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> >> >> > >> > >> > >
