:-) the vote goes at least 72 hours; the time can be used to check the bits and bytes.
-M On 3/9/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits... I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit... -- Adam On 3/9/07, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only > [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, > and why.............. > > Matt Cooper wrote: > > [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only > > [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, > > and why.............. > > > > On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only > >> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, > >> and why.............. > >> > >> On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only > >> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > >> > > [ ] +0 > >> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be > >> released, > >> > > and why.............. > >> > > ------------------------------------------------ > >> > > >> > -M > >> > > >> > > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
