On 5/7/06, Rogers Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Adam. I've filed the issue and implemented your workaround, which was painless and works perfectly.
I just added a corresponding RFE for Shale[1] ... shame on us both for hard coding this sort of thing :-). Craig [1] http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-173 Adam Winer wrote:
> dialog: is correct. There's no init-param to skip this, though > if you look at the NavigationHandlerImpl code in > org.apache.myfaces.adfinternal.application, you'll see > it's *really* simple, and all the interesting code is elsewhere. > So, you could plug in a custom NavigationHandler by > duplicating this code, using a different prefix, and explicitly > registering yours. > > Otherwise, could you file an issue to add an init-param > to configure this prefix? > > -- Adam > > > On 5/7/06, Rogers Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Great to see the code in SVN, excited to see it moving forward. >> >> In the meantime, I've just started exploring the ADF dialog feature, and >> am having problems getting a popup window working. It seems you need to >> name your transition state "dialog:firstDialogPage" in order for >> useWindow="true" to result in a popup (note: some old docs on the web >> said "process:firstDialogPage" and useDialog="true" was the right >> syntax, but this resulted in a plain navigation--i.e. no popup--for me, >> so I'll assume the other docs to be correct), and this causes problems >> when you've got the Shale filter running, as Shale then wants to begin a >> Shale dialog and can't find one. >> >> Does anyone have a workaround for this? I'm not using Shale dialogs at >> all, but am using Shale Tiger and ViewControllers, so if there were a >> way to "turn off" the dialog feature in Shale while leaving the filter >> in, that should do the trick. Last resort, I suppose, will be to change >> the suffix in either ADF or Shale source and rebuild, but I'd love to >> stay away from that if possible. Anybody have a magic init-param they >> can put me onto? :) >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Rogers >> > > >
