Could someone refresh my memory? Was the eventual goal to merge Trinidad and Tomahawk?
If so, I think creating Yet Another Popup Calendar rather than making the existing tomahawk popup calendars play nice with Trinidad is a step in the wrong direction. However, I could be off-base on the eventual goal for these two libraries. On 7/7/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would definitely be of interest! (IMO, it would need to handle internationalization and localization - I'd like to keep Trinidad consistent in this regard.) -- Adam On 7/7/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a quick prompt to see if there is interest in such a feature. We may > have capacity to contribute. I see this being rendered in 'inaccessible' > mode only, perhaps instead of the window'ed calendar - thoughts. > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks Ernst. We're really trying not to stray from Trinidad as a core > > library. However, I do like the look of the Tomahawk version, so that > would > > make a very good start. I guess I'm looking for guidance as to where > this > > would fit and how it would be configured - and indeed if people think > > Trinidad needs one! > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Ernst Fastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > There is a calendar with a JS-Popup mode in the tomahawk-component > > > library. > > > Take a look at: > > > http://www.irian.at/myfaces/calendar.jsf > > > Maybe you can use this one, or at least if you want to implement > > > something > > > similar in trinidad learn from this one. > > > > > > regards > > > > > > Ernst > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Would there be interest in a 3rd calendar mode whereby it popsup a > > > > JavaScript calendar, rather than just the inline and windowed > > > versions? > > > > > > > > If so, is there one out there that people would like to see as the > > > basis on > > > > which to build? > > > > > > > > Danny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
