migrate doesn't mean adding all Tomahawk stuff to Tomahawk or vice versa. Means finding a *common* layer for it's components and finding components for a *merge* (see [1]).
-Matt [1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/Identify_components_to_merge_into_Tomahawk_Shared On 8/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am wondering, where you read that. We will try to migrate some stuff, but migration is a *hard* and long going story. Like adam I am -1 on addind that stuff to Trinidad for the same reasons. He bet me in responding about seconds ... :-) On 8/7/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There has not been a decision on adding either role checking > or force ID to Trinidad. > > My personal starting position is that I'd be -1 on adding > either. Role checking is better accomplished via setting > EL on disabled and readOnly, and force ID is unnecessary > in JSF 1.2 with h:form prependId="false" (and the > removal of requirements for using f:subview). > > -- Adam > > > On 8/7/06, Baker,Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I believe that I read somewhere that while in incubation the important > > attributes of tomahawk (forceid, role checking) would be added to the > > trinidad components. Unfortunately I cannot remember or find where I > > read that statement. I wanted to verify with the list that this is > > true. Will trinidad and tomahawk eventually be merged into one set of > > components that support the skinning and things of ADF, but also support > > the forceid, and role checking of tomahawk. > > > > JB > > > > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
