docment creates these elements <html>, <body>, and <head>,
the trh is the other way to do that. I'd prefer document w/ the facet, M On 10/7/06, Naresh Bhatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Adam. I just found the <trh:html>, <trh:head> and <trh:body> tags. Any advantage of using these vs. the "metaContainer" facet? Naresh -----Original Message----- From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 10:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Use of <tr:document> tag Use the "metaContainer" facet: <tr:document> <f:facet name="metaContainer"> <f:verbatim><script ...../></f:verbatim> </f:facet> </tr:document> On 10/7/06, Naresh Bhatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since the <tr:document> tag encapsulates the generation of <html>, > <body>, and <head> elements, how do I force generation of some elements > in to <head>. For example, I would like my <script> tags to go to the > <head>. (May be not a good example because it appears that <script> tags > are forced into <head> anyway. However, I don't see that documented in > the tag library docs.) > > > > Naresh > > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
