>From my experience I think that's exactly the case. That was my conclusion. I 
>first tried ADF Faces and I had problems to install it to work with NetBeans. 
>Actually I discovered a serious bug that prevents ADF Faces v10 from 
>installing with NetBeans v5.5 correctly. It took me a long time until I 
>figured it out, 'cos I did not get any kind of technical support from their 
>discussion list. Nobody knew anything why I was having difficulty installing 
>it with NetBeans. That was very frustrating, so I dont blame if even Oracle 
>people itself are switching to Trinidad.

Basically my above mentioned problems resulted in me trying Trinidad as an 
alternative and once I got my hands on it I was quite happy to have found it. I 
personally dont see any reason to use ADF Faces over Trinidad. Trinidad is 
much, much better supported + it has a brigther future as a project I believe.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/12/2006 1:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Trinidad replaces ADF Faces?
 
Will Trinidad replace the ADF Faces component set?  I have heard that Oracle
is using Trinidad builds heavily internally.  Is the plan to desupport ADF
Faces components once Trinidad makes it through incubation?  Is there plans
to support Trinidad (visual designer and such) in an upcoming release of
JDeveloper?  Thanks for any light shed.
-Brian

Reply via email to