We've had this error on our project. We are using facelets and eventually we tracked it down to trailing white space within our xhtml file.

Sabina Albu wrote:
Hi,

I am getting an java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException when I change the
content/rows
in the underlying model/list of a Trinidad table.

The number of rows in my table changes upon clicking on a button:
In XHTML:
...
<tr:commandButton text="Reload" action="#{personBean.reloadTable}"/>
...
<tr:table id="tbl" value="#{personBean.persons}" var="person">
 <tr:column>
       ...
       <tr:outputText value="${person.firstname}"/>
 </tr:column>
   ...
</tr:table>

In backing bean:
private java.util.List<Person> persons;
...
public void reloadTable() {
  persons = null;
  persons = getPersons();//DB call to get new List of persons
}

In the initial load getPersons() returns 1 row. After a reload I get 3 rows
and that's when I get the exception:

java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 1, Size: 1
       at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547)
       at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:322)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.StampState.restoreChildStampState (
StampState.java:152)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXTable.restoreStampState(
UIXTable.java:320)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCollection._restoreStampState(
UIXCollection.java :1088)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCollection.postRowDataChange(
UIXCollection.java:690)
at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCollection.setRowIndex(
UIXCollection.java:406)
       at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXTable._processStamps(
UIXTable.java:395)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXTable.processFacetsAndChildren(
UIXTable.java:268)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCollection.decodeChildrenImpl (
UIXCollection.java:159)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.decodeChildren(
UIXComponentBase.java:874)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCollection.processDecodes(
UIXCollection.java :153)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.decodeChildrenImpl(
UIXComponentBase.java:889)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.decodeChildren(
UIXComponentBase.java :874)
       at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXForm.processDecodes(
UIXForm.java:60)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.decodeChildrenImpl(
UIXComponentBase.java:889)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.decodeChildren(
UIXComponentBase.java:874)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.processDecodes(
UIXComponentBase.java:725)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.decodeChildrenImpl(
UIXComponentBase.java:889)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.decodeChildren(
UIXComponentBase.java:874)
       at
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.processDecodes(
UIXComponentBase.java:725)
       at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.processDecodes(
UIComponentBase.java:872)
at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.processDecodes (UIViewRoot.java
:306)
   .....


What I found out until now is that the row index is set, at some point, to
the wrong value(-1).
Also in the sources from Trinidad in
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponent
I found this comment in the getRowKey() method:
// See bug 4534104.
// Sometimes the rowKey for a particular row changes during update model
// (this happens in ADFM if you edit the primary key of a row).
// It is bad if the rowKey changes after _restoreStampState() and
// before _saveStampState(). Therefore, we cache it:..

I know that coding the new lines from within the bean is an option but
I would like to keep the tags. It's easier to do table formatting and
styling.


Any advise is welcomed.


Thanks,
Sabina


Reply via email to