Ah, dialogs... OK, that's not a total shock, because dialogs have a funky lifecycle. Wish I knew more about the impl of Seam so I could provide a better way to propagate the conversation to the dialog. If any Seam experts out there can provide patches to Trinidad, or perhaps even better join a thread on adffaces-dev to talk through these points, I'd be thrilled.
And thanks for providing this link - I've started a Wiki page where we can keep any other known info about integrating the two: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_And_Seam Thanks again, Adam On 12/21/06, Chris Hane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam, Thanks! I am going to be testing it out very shortly. Here is a reply on the jboss-seam forum where someone did have to add some code in order to get dialogs to work. I have not looked into any of this yet, so I'm just passing along the message. http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995439#3995439 Thanks again, Chris.... Adam Winer wrote: > There have been some incompatibilities reported - one I remember > dealt with StateManager ordering - but I'm would be eager to help > get them resolved ASAP. You most definitely should not need to write > any glue code at all, but there likely will be ordering issues > > -- Adam > > > > On 12/19/06, Chris Hane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I am using Seam for a project and am about to start incorporating a >> component framework like Trinidad into the project. I particularly want >> to take advantage of the PPR/Ajax. >> >> I have been reading the Seam forums and it looks like there was some >> glue code that needed to be written to get other libraries (e.g., >> ICEFaces) to work with the Seam. >> >> Does anyone know if Trinidad needs similar integration work? >> >> I'm asking because of a statement in this thread and was wondering if >> anyone else has looked at integrating the two from a Trinidad project >> point of view? >> >> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=94822 >> >> "For most libraries not much, but libraries that do Ajax need some >> added-on lifecycle stuff that sometimes conflicts with Seam's phase >> listeners. Once that stuff gets standardized in the next rev of JSF >> there will be no problem, but for now it generally means a little bit of >> work on both sides to fix any incompatibility. Seam 1.1 beta 2 is much >> more tolerant of Ajax libraries, in this respect." >> >> Thanks, >> Chris.... >> >
