prepared the poms for it but currently the myfaces continuum is not reachable
thx, Matthias On 1/14/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for adding one! -- Adam On 1/13/07, Romanowski, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a continuum build of the 1.2 branch, or are there plans for one > to be added? I'm having problems with the trunk in my JSF1.2 app and > would like to try the Trinidad JSF 1.2 branch...except it is a huge > ordeal to build the latest version behind my proxy. I'm not sure how > many others are using 1.2 at the moment, but thought I'd throw the > request out there. > > Take care, > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Trunk and 1.2 Branch > > The current 1.2 branch: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/branches/faces-1_2-07 > 0102/ > > is 100% up-to-date. There's no strictly defined process, but > what I've been doing is periodically rebranching from trunk > and merging the JSF 1.2 work in. This is a huge pain, but > is the only way to guarantee all trunk patches get in. I'd > certainly be happy to see selected patches merged into the > latest JSF 1.2 branch. > > -- Adam > > > > On 1/3/07, Romanowski, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How up-to-date is the 1.2 branch with respect to the trunk? Is there > a > > defined process in how patches are moved into other branches, or does > > that only occur when a developer feels the need to pull it over? > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
