South Gujarat tribal rebellion spreads, villagers protest move to declare 
Soolpaneshwar sactuary eco-sensitive
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AdRlXjyV6J8/Vf7oqTWJMfI/AAAAAAAANns/mVKNUpqqwg8/s1600/tribal1.png>
*By Ashok Shrimali** 
A fresh tribal rebellion is brewing in South Gujarat. As many as 6,000 
adivasis of 121 villages in and around Soolpaneshwar wildlife sanctuary, 
situated just next to the controversial Narmada dam, have gone on warpath. 
They are protesting against the Government of India’s decision to declare 
the entire sanctuary and the area next to it – about seven kilometers 
radius surrounding it – as “eco-sensitive zone.” 
Following a powerful rally, organized by Adivasi Ekta Parishad, headed by 
tribal leader Ashok Choudhury, in which  people of 121 villages, as other 
villagers of Dediapada and Sagbara talukas participated, a memorandum 
submitted to the local authorities said they have “not been consulted” 
before declaring the area as eco-sensitive zone. The memorandum has been 
addressed to the secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate 
Change. 
The fresh protest is in addition to at least three other anti-government 
movements going on with tribal participation in South Gujarat. People of 
more than sixty villages around the Narmada dam have been raising their 
against the decision of the government to develop the Kevadia colony – 
where the dam is situated – as a tourism spot, next to the Sardar 
Vallabhbhai Patel's 182-metre statue, which is under construction. 
According to the tribals around the Narmada dam, if the tourism project is 
implemented, they would lose their precious agricultural land. In fact, 
according to them, the land where the Kevadia colony housing government 
engineers and other staff for building the dam hase already been vacated as 
officials have been shifted, and the tribals want it back. 
Not very far away, the Adivasi Kisan Sangharsh Morcha (AKSM), an upcoming 
tribal farmers’ organization under the leadership of Romel Sutariya, has 
been demanding action against the sand mafia in the riverbed off 
Chhotaudepur township. AKSM’s radical postures led the state government to 
brand Sutariya’s organization “Naxalite”, even impose prohibitory orders by 
citing the danger of terrorist activities, which it had to regret later.
<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DMDM-dgEA8s/Vf7pCPCL1II/AAAAAAAANn0/CddzglINARI/s1600/tribal.png>
The representation by Soolpaneshwar sanctuary villagers says that the 
notification for hearing on the area declaring it and seven kilometers 
radius around it as eco-sensitive zone was “never never made available” to 
them published in Gujarati, and they had to "obtain" a Hindi version on 
their own. “This type of indifference is shocking”, they insist. 
Further, the representation says, the decision to declare it an 
eco-sensitive zone has been taken at a time when the villagers are being 
enrolled for handing over land they had been cultivating for several 
decades under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006. “The decision clearly 
violates the FRA, 2006, which clearly states that the gram sabhas have the 
right to decide about the future of the forests”, the representation says. 
The representation further says that, even for declaring an eco-sensitive 
zone, there has to be an official procedure, “which has not been followed.” 
A high-level committee would need to be formed, consisting of the chief 
wildlife warden of the Gujarat government, a wildlife expert, a senior 
official of the state revenue department, and a senior panchayats 
representative for finding out pros and cons. 
“However, this has not been done”, the representation points out, wondering 
how could the area be declared eco-sensitive without this process being 
completed or taken the view of the villagers. “We firmly oppose the 
Government of India move, and want the decision to be immediately taken 
back”, it adds. 
“Instead of declaring it an eco-sensitive zone, it would be better if the 
government concentrates on providing basic infrastructure such as roads, 
water, medicine and electricity, which is not there in many of the 
villages”, the representation says, adding, “Villagers have to walk from 
five to 10 kilometres to access transportation even today.”
---
**Senior activist, Gujarat* 

-- 
Learn More about AYUSH online at : http://www.adiyuva.in/2013/10/ayush.html
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AYUSH | adivasi yuva shakti" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to adiyuva+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to adiyuva@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adiyuva.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adiyuva/75f5fcd6-2bf7-419f-ac51-058fb8846667%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to