Ian Anderson wrote: > Advocacy is another issue. I think Canopener.ca is better equipped to > handle that, they have a broader mandate (all open source software) and > that is their primary objective. Also if CLUE stays out of advocacy it > has a better chance at getting charitable status which will really help > with fund raising.
Never heard of Canopener.ca, until you mentioned it, and I try to keep up on Linux news. Doesn't seem that they're keeping Canadains too well informed - perhaps there is room for another advocacy group? Honestly, if CLUE's purpose isn't advocacy, what do you see it's purpose being? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
