On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for immediate release. Based on the screenshot and the work I know > y'all have been doing, what we currently have is a substantial development > from alpha1. We wouldn't be whistling in the dark if we were to call this > build alpha2. That's what I would prefer as well. I made a tarball and tried building on OSX 10.5 using both CMake and traditional build. I got them both to compile, but with CMake the RPATH entries for the backend modules are wrong, so it fails to load them at runtime. With autotools, that's no issue, but it crashes at startup :-(. I'm not so much concerned about the CMake issue. A little note that it's still experimental and primarily used to build win32 binaries should do the trick :-). But I do want to look into the second issue. Maybe I just messed up my SDL installation ... Remains a final test on Ubuntu afterwards, then I think it's good to go. Kai _______________________________________________ Adonthell-devel mailing list Adonthell-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-devel
