On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Andrew Phillips <phillip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My apologies for not responding sooner. I looked over the release notes. > There was a note in there that 3.0 is deliberately not backward compatible > with 2.x. I don't know how drastically they changed the core language. There > are some things that probably aren't going to matter to us, such as changing > print to require the same syntax as a function call, rather than working > either as a function or a built-in statement. The biggest issue might be that change that all strings are now unicode. Not sure if that will bite us, since we're only using ASCII characters anyway. I would try and compile stuff myself with the new versions, but I'm a bit reluctant to do so on the Mac, as I want to produce binaries with the libs that come with the default installation. Not sure if I can get hold of my wifes laptop long enough to fire up Ubuntu and try ... Besides, my todo list is long enough as is ;-). Kai _______________________________________________ Adonthell-devel mailing list Adonthell-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-devel
