>> If I were to set the "Next Storage Pool" field on TAPE1 pool to be
>> TAPE2 and set the TAPE1 pool access to READONLY, will the TAPE1 pool
>> basically be skipped and the TAPE2 pool be used as secondary storage for
>> pool DISK1?
>
>I don't know, but you can force data movement from DISK1 to TAPE2 simply by
>updating the definition of DISK1 to specify TAPE2 as its next storage pool.
You could cause a storage pool to be skipped by setting its MAXSize value
to a silly, small number.
Richard Sims, BU
