Hi Paul!
I don't know anything about AIT. We are currently using 3570 because of it's
fast data access times, but we need a larger library. Since we are already
using the largest one (3575-L32) our only option was to use more libraries.
Not something you would like to do in a TSM configuration.
We narrowed the choices down to two, 3590 and LTO. 3590 because it's
compatible with our OS/390 environment, should we want to integrate in the
future, and LTO  because it's an open architecture. We choose for 3590
because little was known about LTO about a year ago.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 20:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LTO versus 3590


At 01:32 PM 2/7/2001 +0100, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
...
>the LTO start/stop characteristics are something to take in consideration.
>Data on a 100 GB. volume can (and will) be scattered across the tape, so
>when you are restoring a lot of data, you will see long seek times. We
>choose for 3590 over LTO for this reason.
>Kindest regards,
>Eric van Loon

Eric,
Do you know anything about AIT's start/stop characteristics?  Did you
consider AIT before making your decision to go with 3590?
..Paul


**********************************************************************
This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material 
intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that 
no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and 
may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart 
Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for 
the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor 
responsible for any delay in receipt.
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to