one more thing .... you can not restore from copy-container pool as you do with normal copy pool. If your dir-container is damage /lost, you have to use copy-container to restore dir-container pool and after that restore client data..... so time to restore generaly will be increased...
HTH Chavdar On Friday, May 12, 2017, Michael Prix <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Mark, > > IBM has decided shortly after introducing the Copy-Containerpools to handle > them not the same way as legacy containerpools, but like legacy primary > pools. > Thus said, you can't make them OFFSITE, and thus you can't use the > benefites > of DRM. Handle them like primary storagepool volumes with regard to volumes > taken out of the library, e.g. UNAVAILABLE instead of OFFSITE. > > -- > Michael Prix > > On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 10:25 +0200, Mark Beta wrote: > > Is there anyone who has encountered this problem over me? > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Mark Beta <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > With IBM Spectrum Protect Version 7.1.7 and later, you can protect > > > directory-container storage pools by copying the data to container-copy > > > storage pools, where the data is stored on tape volumes. > > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.0/srv > > > .admin/t_contcp_stgpool_protect.html > > > > > > But the question is, when i have a spectrum protect with NOT extended > > > edition license, how i can rotate tape volumes offsite without using > DRM > > > that is not included in the license? > > > > > > Knowledge center (link above) says: > > > > > > "If DRM is not configured, you must do so or USE AN ALTERNATE METHOD TO > > > ROTATE TAPES OFFSITE" > > > If i try to rotate offsite like legacy copy storage pool, updating the > > > volume access and location, for scripting tape rotation, i get: > > > ANR2117E UPDATE VOLUME: Access mode for volume 000001L7 cannot be > changed > > > to "offsite" - volume either does not belong to a copy storage pool or > > > from > > > a device class of DEVTYPE=SERVER. > > > ANR2212I UPDATE VOLUME: No volumes updated. > > > > > > The volume was checked out from the library, but the access is > > > "readwrite". > > > The next "protect stgpool type=local" the volume probably will be > > > attempted to access, and will be put in unavailable. > > > Butreclamation will be effective and the volume will be reclaimed and > > > "scratched" So that I can bring it back to free when it reaches the > empty > > > state? > > > > > > I can not understand how it may be mandatory to have DRM. > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > Mark > > > >
