Hi Stefan, not very technical reason, V5030 was already available because an Oracle RAC is just migrated to Flashsystem 900, so we reused it for this new spectrum protect, instead buy a lower spec storage. Also performance will better for sure on SAS drives versus NL-SAS.
JR On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Folkerts <[email protected] > wrote: > No knowledge about that type of Linux cluster. > Could you explain why you picked the V5030 over the V5020 and why you are > going for 15K drives in a system that will use the containerpool? > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:48 AM, adsm consulting <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > We are planning to implement spectrum protect 8.1 in RHEL cluster with 2 > > nodes for HA reason. > > The shared SAN storage will be a storwize V5030, with disks for database > on > > SSD and SAS15Krpm for directory container storage pools. > > Also we will have in near feature a TS3310 for copy container for in site > > protection. > > > > > > In the knowledge center there is no configuration examples abount Redhat > > Enterprise linux clustering (pacemaker). > > So I am asking if anybody has made this kind of configuration before me. > > > > Blueprint linux 3.1 can give some indication only for standard no > clustered > > configuration. > > Infact for example no LVM configuration is made. > > One of my question is for example about Database disks: > > On the storage i will made 4 VDISK (LUN), i shuld put them in unique VG > and > > split after in 4 LV? Or si prefferred to made 4 VG with 1 LV each? > > > > Thank you if somebody will share his experience. > > > > Greetings. > > > > James R. > > >
