Content preview: We have a few dozen Windows systems, but nothing complex
enough
to require more than simple POSIX permissions. Most of those Windows systems
are instrument systems feeding an analysis pipeline and all connect with
a single user account. The regular user accounts just belong to standard UNIX
groups so don't really require ACLs to manage. [...]
Content analysis details: (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
X-Barracuda-Connect: mx.gs.washington.edu[128.208.8.134]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1518102266
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
X-Barracuda-URL: https://148.100.49.28:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at marist.edu
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1342
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5
QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.5 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.47714
Rule breakdown below
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
We have a few dozen Windows systems, but nothing complex enough to require
more than simple POSIX permissions. Most of those Windows systems are
instrument systems feeding an analysis pipeline and all connect with a
single user account. The regular user accounts just belong to standard UNIX
groups so don't really require ACLs to manage.
Most of the systems using the storage are Linux cluster nodes running the
analysis pipeline over NFS.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:44:37AM -0500, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> So you don't have any Windows filesystems on the ISILON? You are a purely
> Linux/Unix shop?
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Skylar Thompson <skyl...@u.washington.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Content preview: We briefly looked into doing replication, but trying to
> > convince
> > our user base (scientists) that they should get several petabytes of
> > disk
> > that they couldn't directly use would have been a non-starter. At the
> > time
> > we also "only" had 10Gbps Internet connection, and sync'ing upwards of
> > 50TB/day
> > would have consumed a substantial part of that uplink. :) [...]
--
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine
