You definitely need enough iron to do this. It's just a question of
whether to put your servers in 1 big box or two smaller ones. We haven't
seen memory leak problems lately, so I'm not worried about that.
I agree with Richard Rhodes' comment that we shouldn't have to do this just
to get around limitations of the product, but right now that's the way it is.
At 10:31 AM 5/10/2001 -0500, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) wrote:
>Hi
>
>But memory utilization , network utilization and CPU utilization and memory
>leaks will be high.
>Am I right.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:08 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine
>
>
>The reason I would do it would be to keep the database size down.
>
>At 11:41 AM 5/9/2001 -0400,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Why would one put multiple TSM servers on a single machine?
