Re: Disk pool size vs large file

[Lisa Cabanas]

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_related 006B693286256A7A_=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 006B693586256A7A_="


--=_alternative 006B693586256A7A_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

And backing up ;-)

Sorry-- I couldn't resist.  I will not blindly reply with the entire
history heretofore.

lisa






Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/29/2001 01:35 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        cc:     (bcc: Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT)
        Subject:        Re: Disk pool size vs large file



>...*please* trim your email responses...

Amen, Mark.  It's dismaying to see, like, a one-sentence response to an
issue
which includes the entire thread of a discussion along with it, running
for
hundreds of lines.  If you've visited www.adsm.org to like Browse Current
Month,
you've seen how postings are nicely related by the email Subject and time.
There is no need to append everything that came before.

Eliminating needless bulk in email does a lot to help eliminate waste in
Internet traffic, Sendmail processing times, mail spool space, and human
travail.  If nothing else, think of all the Listserv archive space that
your
gracious list host, Marist, is giving over to all this data.

   thanks,  Richard Sims, BU


--=_alternative 006B693586256A7A_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">And backing up ;-) &nbsp;</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Sorry-- I couldn't resist. &nbsp;I will not
blindly reply with the entire history heretofore.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">lisa</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Richard Sims &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;</b></font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">06/29/2001 01:35 PM</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to &quot;ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager&quot;</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To: &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; &nbsp;[EMAIL PROTECTED]</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cc: &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; &nbsp;(bcc: Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT)</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Subject: &nbsp;
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Re: Disk pool size vs large file</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><img src=cid:_1_2A280000444C006B692F86256A7A>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&gt;...*please* trim your email
responses...<br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Amen, Mark. &nbsp;It's dismaying to see,
like, a one-sentence response to an issue<br>
which includes the entire thread of a discussion along with it, running for<br>
hundreds of lines. &nbsp;If you've visited www.adsm.org to like Browse Current
Month,<br>
you've seen how postings are nicely related by the email Subject and time.<br>
There is no need to append everything that came before.<br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Eliminating needless bulk in email does a lot
to help eliminate waste in<br>
Internet traffic, Sendmail processing times, mail spool space, and human<br>
travail. &nbsp;If nothing else, think of all the Listserv archive space that
your<br>
gracious list host, Marist, is giving over to all this data.<br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp;thanks, &nbsp;Richard Sims,
BU</font>
<br>
<br>
--=_alternative 006B693586256A7A_=--
--=_related 006B693286256A7A_=
Content-Type: image/gif
Content-ID: <_1_2A280000444C006B692F86256A7A>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

R0lGODlhOQIEAIAAAAAAAAAAACwAAAAAOQIEAEACtE6Oqct9AYH/+vfu7OUNAOABgUG5R2Lw4Uh/
U2AVwURIIyX9E11dfccKmR+TkPG4akmLzmCzaEKpWN9l85n7/VBC4v8IBiS/d/Q7PX+72Wl32XVO
m3OeX+ZCW3m4HkYAfMAgyBDIIAAQwDAxoaUR5DFUFGY0RvX0xDQVlVJ5mUkH0HjxCBD5NRnSial5
wklluQoq2s1X6oWaSjXFRLS548KbpfGDgOAx6COJu8zc7PwcEY06AAA7
--=_related 006B693286256A7A_=--