Hi Anne, Look on P. 95 of the TSM V4.2 Technical Guide, new draft Redbook SG24-6277. as of Aug 10.
It says those are "excludes that are either listed by the registry hive as files that should be excluded or by the TSM backup-archive client as files that should not be backed up." P. 94 gives the name of the registry key in Win2K that has the list of files not to back up. What bothers me about this, is that C:\adsm.sys\...\* is EXCLUDED automatically. I thought that was supposed to be fixed by 4.2. ************************************************************************ Wanda Prather The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab 443-778-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think" - Scott Adams/Dilbert ************************************************************************ -----Original Message----- From: Short, Anne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1 One thing I noticed with the new 4.2.0 client code, is that for the W2K clients only (not NT and not UNIX), when I do a "q inclexcl", the list now includes "Operating System" excludes. Can't find this new feature documented anywhere...at least not in the places I've looked. Can anyone shed some light on this? TIA Anne Short Lockheed Martin Enterprise Information Systems Gaithersburg, Maryland 301-240-6184 CODA/I Storage Management -----Original Message----- From: Henk ten Have [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.1 On 22-Oct-01 Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote: > For all those who are thinking of upgrading to 4.2.1, my opinion is > don't. I have been up on it for 10 days and have already experienced 3 > crashes. I also have a tape problem that I'm told was supposed to have > been fixed. I have 2 PMR's open, both at level 2. I'm on AIX 4.3.3 and > not sure if other platforms have had similar problems.
