We have been running a FastT200 in production since 11/2000. It has been a solid platform and has survived two power outages with no problems. We have been using FastT500 and Exp500 frames in a test environment for a few months without any failures. If I ever move TSM from our 390 I will use FastT disk for the storage. Cheap - fast - easy to work with & reliable.
-----Original Message----- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IBM FAStT Disk Storage for TSM server We currently have TSM Server 3.7.4.0 on RS6000 F50 with internal 4.5GB SSA Disks and External IBM ESS. Looking to upgrade server. One of the possibilities for TSM Server disk storage is IBM's new FAStT Disk storage. We want disk storage totally "local" to server. Does anyone have this disk storage for TSM server or have an opinion on it? We will be meeting with our Business Rep next week to look at details. Will probably upgrade TSM Server to 4.1 or 4.2 at about same time Thanks, David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax: 321.434.5525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "MMS <health-first.org>" made the following annotations on 10/25/01 09:50:08 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ============================================================================ ==
