Looks like it's a known bug. Check the knowledge base, and there's no real fix according to another message in the forum here.
Sorry, Kevin. -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Selva, Perpetua Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: client is down-level with this server version. - 4.1.2.12 This is on a NT client 4.0 machine, when I try to backup , query filespace from the client, the session is rejected. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 9:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: client is down-level with this server version. - > 4.1.2.12 > > That's not enough information, but I would check maxschedsessions > parameter and increase it appropriately if it's limiting the total > amount of sessions. Also, you might want to put a disk pool in front of > your tape pool in order to allow all the data to backup to a pool (not > limited by number of tape drives for concurrent sessions) and then force > a migration from disk to tape pool using hi= and low= parameters in a > script. I'll show you mine: > > update stg ptdisk_online_90 hi=0 lo=0 > > and then later reset the disk back so it will hold some data until > migration is triggered: > > update stg ptdisk_online_90 hi=70 lo=0 > > I run these by administrative scheduler at the appropriate times. I > simply call the scripts. > > Hope this helps, > > Kevin. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Selva, Perpetua > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 9:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: client is down-level with this server version. - 4.1.2.12 > > Can someone please tell me why some clients refuse to backup and the > others > just come up with the warnings? > > > Please let me know
