I would try:

- backing up to disk first (disk pool)
- or backup to multiple tape drives at once. How many tape drives to you have?
- collocate by filespace might help (but I'm not sure for P & T)
- tune your TSM database (what is your server?)
- make multiple volumes on your NetWare server or you could try the virtual mount 
point option
- make sure your NetWare server has enough CPU and memory
- what is LAN connection to your TSM server?
- check the RESOURCEUTILIZATION parameter of the client, as well as TCPBuffersize, 
TCPWindowSize, TCPNODELAY, TXNBytelimit
- check the number of mount points for the node:
tsm: UNXR>q node unxp f=d

                     Node Name: UNXP
                      Platform: AIX
               Client OS Level: 4.3
                Client Version: Version 4, Release 1, Level 3.0
<snip>
             Keep Mount Point?: No
  Maximum Mount Points Allowed: 6

- why don't you use hardware compression? Software (compression) is definitely not 
what you want.

You are right about the performance could be better:
Here is AIX Client that is tune well (I hope!):
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4952I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of    
objects inspected:  135 487                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4954I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of    
objects backed up:    2 309                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4958I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of    
objects updated:          0                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4960I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of    
objects rebound:          0                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4957I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of    
objects deleted:          0                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4970I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of     
objects expired:     13 138                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4959I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of    
objects failed:           0                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4961I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Total number of    
bytes transferred:    60.53 GB                           
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4963I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Data transfer time:   
8 261.61 sec                              
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4966I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Network data       
transfer rate:        7 682.73 KB/sec                    
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4967I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Aggregate data    
transfer rate:      12 445.33 KB/sec                     
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4968I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Objects compressed     
by:                    0%                                
12/19/01   14:25:28      ANE4964I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP)  Elapsed processing   
time:            01:25:00                                

PS: Does any one else have the Aggregate exceed the Network transfer rate? This seems 
odd, but I think that the multiple streams to the server account for the apparent 
discrepancy.

miles


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miles Purdy 
System Manager
Farm Income Programs Directorate
Winnipeg, MB, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (204) 984-1602 fax: (204) 983-7557

"If you hold a UNIX shell up to your ear, can you hear the C?"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18-Dec-01 4:15:35 AM >>>
 I had a Netware 4.1 with TSM Client 4.1.2.16 backing directly on Scalar
1000 (DLT8000). I run a full backup and the process took so long **..

12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4952I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of objects inspected:   61,078         
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4954I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of objects backed up:   60,985         
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4958I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of objects updated:          0         
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4960I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of objects rebound:          0         
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4957I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of objects deleted:          0         
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4970I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of objects expired:          0         
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4959I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of objects failed:           7         
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4961I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Total
number of bytes transferred:     5.82 GB      
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4963I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Data
transfer time:                1,465.86 sec     
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4966I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Network
data transfer rate:        4,168.04 KB/sec  
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4967I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)
Aggregate data transfer rate:        249.11 KB/sec  
12/18/2001 09:18:58 ANE4968I (Session: 1220, Node: DRM_HAIFA-MAINT)  Objects
compressed by:                    0%        

The transfer time and transfer rate looks O.K but look to the Aggregate
data transfer rate !!!!

No compress involve * Any idea how can I improve this process  

Thanks in Advance

Robert Ouzen
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to