This was the case for me, before I started tuning TSM 4.1. After I changed the
resourceutilization, I started getting different statistics - compared to 3.1.
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4952I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
objects inspected: 135 487
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4954I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
objects backed up: 2 309
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4958I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
objects updated: 0
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4960I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
objects rebound: 0
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4957I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
objects deleted: 0
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4970I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
objects expired: 13 138
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4959I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
objects failed: 0
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4961I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
bytes transferred: 60.53 GB
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4963I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Data transfer time:
8 261.61 sec
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4966I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Network data
transfer rate: 7 682.73 KB/sec
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4967I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Aggregate data
transfer rate: 12 445.33 KB/sec
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4968I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Objects compressed
by: 0%
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4964I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Elapsed processing
time: 01:25:00
Miles
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miles Purdy
System Manager
Farm Income Programs Directorate
Winnipeg, MB, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (204) 984-1602 fax: (204) 983-7557
"If you hold a UNIX shell up to your ear, can you hear the C?"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20-Dec-01 8:32:00 AM >>>
With my systems and I think most, the Network transfer time will be (much)
faster than the Aggregate time.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/20/01 08:44AM >>>
The network transfer rate is the time is takes to send the file to be backed up to the
TSM server.
The aggregate is the total KB backed up / the total time.
The difference is the processing time. The time to contact the TSM server and check if
the file needs to be backed up.
Interestingly enough, my aggregate usually exceeds the network, I was asking yesterday
if any one else sees this.
Miles
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miles Purdy
System Manager
Farm Income Programs Directorate
Winnipeg, MB, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (204) 984-1602 fax: (204) 983-7557
"If you hold a UNIX shell up to your ear, can you hear the C?"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20-Dec-01 4:45:16 AM >>>
Hi
I run a full backup of a Netware 5 with Tivoli client 4.2.0 here the
statistics:
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects inspected: 33,310
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects backed up: 33,104
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects updated: 0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects rebound: 0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects deleted: 0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects expired: 0
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects failed: 3
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of bytes transferred: 1.33 GB
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Data transfer time: 138.38 sec
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Network data transfer rate: 10,099.94 KB/sec
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Aggregate data transfer rate: 802.25 KB/sec
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Objects compressed by: 0%
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Elapsed processing time: 00:29:02
Can anybody explain why my Network data transfer rate is so high but my
Aggregate data transfer rate is low !!!!!!!!!!!!
T.I.A Regards
Robert Ouzen
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
annotations on 12/20/01 09:44:17
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is
waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications
through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely
those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or
opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by
the entity to give such views or opinions.
==============================================================================
