Wow, now that is a great answer. Thanks. Jeff
> -----Original Message----- > From: Prather, Wanda [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Rebinding > > Just tested this to be sure. > Inactive versions are rebound when the active version is rebound. > > But in the case where there is NO active version, the inactive versions > won't be rebound at all. > (These would be inactive backup versions of files that have been deleted > from the client.) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack Musselman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Rebinding > > > Jeff, > > I found an explanation for your question in the TSM Admin Guide for AIX, > pages 244-250. In general, rebinding is done for backup versions if any > of > the following applies: > > 1. The user changes the management class specified in the include-exclude > list and does a backup. > 2. An admin activates a policy set in the same policy domain as the client > node and the policy set does no contain a management class with the same > name as the management class to which a file is currently bound. > 3. An administrator assigns a client node to a different policy domain, > and > the active policy set in that policy domain does not have a management > class > with the same name. > > The inactive versions will be rebound to the associated management class > of > the next backup. > > Hope this helps. > > Jack Musselman > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jeff > Bach > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 1:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Rebinding > > Kelly, > > For active files, I have seen this is the case. I was not aware > that after a file was marked inactive by the client that the inactive file > was examined or changed by the client? > > What process on the server then would change the management class > for inactive files? I am not indicating that it does or does not, but I > would like to better understand this aspect or rebinding a management > class. > > Jeff Bach > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kelly Lipp [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:59 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Rebinding > > > > Yes. > > > > Kelly J. Lipp > > Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. > > PO Box 51313 > > Colorado Springs, CO 80949 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com > > (719)531-5926 > > Fax: (240)539-7175 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Gianni Garda > > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:59 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Rebinding > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I have a node associated to a policy domain named XXX with only one > policy > > set(active),one Mgmclass and a backup copy group with verexist=5 and > > retextra=30. > > If I update my node to a new policy domain YYY with same configuration > but > > with verexist=4 and retextra=90 and start a backup are my old backups > > rebound to new mgmclass or not ? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > ------------------------------------------ > > Gianni Garda > > > ********************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential > and intended solely for the individual or entity to > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email > in error destroy it immediately. > **********************************************************************
