I would also suggest that you look at the 3584 tape library. It has some
limitations vs. the 3494, but it is considerably less expensive. The major
differences are:
- The 3584 cannot be attached to a mainframe. Not an issue when replacing
a 3575.
- The LTO drives in the 3584 are poorer at load time and backspacing. This
could be a decisive issue replacing a 3575. The Magstar MP drives in the
3575 will outperform the 3580 LTO drive in this area. This is primarily an
issue for HSM applications.
- The LTO can hold 100GB (native) on a tape, while the limit on the 3590
tape is 40 MB.
_____________________________
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
"Prather, Wanda"
<Wanda.Prather@JH To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UAPL.EDU> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: 3494 Tape Library
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
02/01/2002 11:55
AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
It's an absolutely fabulous piece of enterprise-class hardware.
I can't think of any reason you would be sorry you had one.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3494 Tape Library
SMers
I'm currently using a 3575 tape library and have to make or not make a
recommendation to move to a 3494 library.
For those who have one already I'd be interested in your eval of the 3494,
good,
bad or indefferent.
Thanks for your help
Gene
