Since you're mostly Intel based, why not a Win2K solution?  I know of a very
large site that backs up over 600 GB per night from well over 100 systems to
a Dell Quad Xeon, SAN storage, STK Powderhorn with 9840 drives (10 total).
Their database is over 100 GB.  I don't think you have to rule out the
platform that you are probably most familiar with.   Give it a try.  If you
need a contact, email me off the list and I'll provide one for you.

Thanks,

Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax: (240)539-7175


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Malbrough, Demetrius
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS


-Mark-

>I would also like to know advantages and disadvantages for the different
flavors of Unix and vendors?

See the Redbook "Getting Started with Tivoli Storage Manager: Implementation
Guide" Table 13 for some helpful information.

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/pubs/pdfs/redbooks/sg245416.pdf

Thanks,

Demetrius Malbrough
UNIX/TSM/OnDemand Administrator

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS


I have been given a couple of days to come up with specifications for a RISC
based server system to run TSM  for a 100 + node network.  The clients are
NT/Win2K and NetWare. The system must talk to the StorageTek 9490 - Powder
Horn.  I figured that among all the TSMers out there that have working RISC
based systems  that someone would already have specifications that I could
quickly modify for my environment and then bid out.  I would also like to
know advantages and disadvantages for the different flavors of Unix and
vendors.  Also since I work for a local government keeping the price low is
a must.  Any help is greatly appreciated.

Reply via email to