The 3590 is a dual ported device.  It actually has two fiber port WWPNs.
AIX actually is talking to both ports all the time but only sends out
primary IO right now to whichever is the current primary.  What is coming is
load balancing based on what I know.  This way the ES-1000s will have
balanced IO if both ports are connected to 2 different pathways (ES-1000s).
Finally, there is a reason 3590 is far superior.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover


They aren't dual ported.  I have (8) 3580 LTO drives FC-AL attached.  I
have (2) McData ES-1000 switches with 4 drives on each switch.  The
library control path is currently through DRIVE 1.  I am actually looking
for
failover of the Library (/dev/smc0), in case of failure of drive 1 or the
McData switch it's on.  I can configure a second control path (in fact I
have
done this on drive 5 and it comes up on AIX as /dev/smc1, but I am not
using it).

As I read the readme on Atape it seemed the auto failover was what would
handle this, but it says only for 3590 devices.

The library has hot swap drives, but if drive1 failed or needs to be
replaced I have some amount of downtime that I wouldn't have with the other
drives.

David Longo

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/26/02 04:15PM >>>
Are the 3584 drives dual ported?

-----Original Message-----
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Atape driver 7.0.3.0 auto failover


I notice that the Atape driver 7.0.3.0 supports Auto failover for tape
devices on 3590 devices only, as I read it.  Anybody know when it will be
supported on 3584 library with Fibre Channel?  Or is someone using it that
way now?

David Longo


"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 02/26/02 14:22:31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or
opinions.

============================================================================
==



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 02/26/02 16:53:21
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or
opinions.

============================================================================
==

Reply via email to