Matt, No, that isn't what it does, but it would be more useful if it worked that way. Jim Sporer
At 03:01 PM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Can it be used to do both a MIGRATE and a COPY? Ie, as it moves from disk >to tape, it is also writing to a 2nd tape that is a part of the COPYPOOL >which will go offsite? That would make it more in line with other >mainframe copy products. Dual write, one for onsite and one for offsite. >Matt > >-----Original Message----- >From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:07 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: TSM 5.1 > >#2 is not the panacea that it sounds like. The dual writes to the >copypool's happens during session data transfer to disk pool - thus, you >must have a tape drive per session doing the dual write. > >Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_ >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ >BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' >St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_) >Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html > >On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Richard L. Rhodes wrote: > > > We had a meeting with IBM last week where they described some of the > > new features of 5.1 - coming within a few weeks. > > > > 1) multi session restore > > 2) simultaneous writes to copy pools (more than one) > > 3) a "move nodedata" command > > 4) lan-free backup/restore (I thought it already had this) > > 5) hpux lan-free > >
