AFAIK

dsmstat is a process that uns alongside dsmc and holds dsmc's hand when it
scan NFS mount point to make sure it doesnt 'hang' if the NFS mountpoit is
broken. If the mountpoint is not responding my understanding was dsmstat
manipulates the situation so dsmc can carry on.

I found this out from various sources when we had a problem with dsmstat
appearing hung every morning on some clients.

Apparently, tsm will stat _ALL_ available mountpoints regardless of DOMAIN
options etc.. when the backup first starts up, filtering of what to backup
then takes place (through the DOMAIN options etc..)


Matt.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Cabanas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NFS MOUNTS


FWIW, on AIX, even if you aren't backing up NFS mounts, if one of the
mounts is hung, then your incremental is hosed and it terminates.  I
started noticing this behaviour in/around the 3.7 code level.

lisa



                    David Longo
                    <David.Longo@HEALTH-       To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    FIRST.ORG>                 cc:
                    Sent by: "ADSM: Dist       Subject:     Re: NFS MOUNTS
                    Stor Manager"
                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    U>


                    03/13/2002 04:26 PM
                    Please respond to
                    "ADSM: Dist Stor
                    Manager"






TSM by default DOES NOT backup NFS mounts.  You have to specifically
tell it to with the DOMAIN statement in dsm.opt or dsm.sys, depending
on your platform.  What platform is this?

Maybe there is a CLOPSET set on the server to back it up?

David Longo

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/13/02 04:43PM >>>
We ran into a problem with NFS mounts on one our clients.
The NFS server went down and when the client tried to backup it just hung.

My question is why does TSM back up NFS by default with no real way to turn
it off.

What can we do to not look at the NFS mounts.

I have tried different exclude statements, but to no avail.
Does anyone have any suggestions?

TSM server 3.7.4
Client 3.7.2.15

Mark Adams
Systems Programmer
CSG Systems, Inc.



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 03/13/02 17:39:49
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify
the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where
the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular
entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views
or opinions.

============================================================================
==

Reply via email to