Maybe I need to investigate this further.  I am only related what my
Netware people told me.  Maybe there is another change in the file that
is screwing it up.

Andy Carlson                             |\      _,,,---,,_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]            ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
BJC Health System                       |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri                    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:

> Hi Cameron!
> It depends. TSM does not change the archive bit after a backup. This is what
> your TSM rep was referring to.
> However, if you change the change bit of a file, TSM will update the file on
> the server. It does not re-send the complete file, but it sends the updated
> attribute information only. I have tested this on the Windows client, so I
> can't speak for the Novell client...
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cameron Ambrose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 22:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Arhive Bit on Netware after Tape Backup/Restore
>
>
> Hi Andy
>
>      I was under the impression(from an TSM rep) that TSM didn't pay any
> attention to the archive bit, but tracked the dates/changes of files
> itself.
>
> Regards Cameron
>
>
>
>                     Andy Carlson
>                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                     RENET.ORG>             cc:
>                     Sent by: "ADSM:        Subject:     Arhive Bit on
> Netware after Tape Backup/Restore
>                     Dist Stor
>                     Manager"
>                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                     ST.EDU>
>
>
>                     03/16/2002
>                     03:12 AM
>                     Please respond
>                     to "ADSM: Dist
>                     Stor Manager"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We have some big Netware (running Groupwise) servers that the admins
> will backup/upgrade os/restore using DLT tape instead of TSM.  The
> problem is that they claim the arhive bit is set off, so TSM backs all
> the files up on the next incremental.  Has anyone else experienced
> this?  Is there a neat utility to turn the archive bits back
> on?  Thanks.
>
> Andy Carlson                             |\      _,,,---,,_
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]            ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
> BJC Health System                       |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
> St. Louis, Missouri                    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)
> Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. 
>This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material 
>intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that 
>no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
>that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, 
>and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the 
>sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart 
>Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for 
>the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor 
>responsible for any delay in receipt.
> **********************************************************************
>

Reply via email to