If all that does not work, try removing device and running cfgmgr again.
Maybe that tape drive is backlevel on microcode ? I have run different
levels of microcode just to see if it had problems, 99% of the time it did
not..
Gabriel C. Wiley
ADSM/TSM Administrator
AIX Support
Phone 1-614-308-6709
Pager 1-877-489-2867
Fax 1-614-308-6637
Cell 1-740-972-6441
Siempre Hay Esperanza
"Williams, Tim P
{PBSG}" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<Tim.Williams@PBS cc:
G.COM> Subject: Re: Question about tape drive
utilization and the summary file
Sent by: "ADSM:
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
04/03/2002 06:40
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
lsdev -Cc tape
can you see the drive?
Ted has a good idea...
q mount shows nothing?
q sess f=d shows no mount for that drive?
mtlib -l/dev/lmcp0 -qM (query mount from aix if you have aix...) to look
for a mount on the operating
system level...
is the drive available at the 3494?
some ideas.
-----Original Message-----
From: Qualls, Ted W {PBSG} [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about tape drive utilization and the summary file
Have you tried taking drives 0,1 and 3 offline to see if drive 2 gets a
mount?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Jelinek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about tape drive utilization and the summary file
Is the summary file supposed to list all tape mounts for drives online to
TSM? I thought that I would use the summary log to determine tape
utilization. When I pulled the data, I discovered that we have been using
drives 0,1, and 3 but not using drive 2 (not a single mount in a month and
a
half according to the summary table). And yes, the drive has been online to
TSM the whole time with no errors reported that I can find. Am I missing
something obvious? We have a 3494 library with 3590 drives.
Thanks in advance.
--
David Jelinek
Systems Programmer
Central Michigan University
