Thanks, an additional question before setting up the configuration : second copy-pool with same device-class means that the data physically go to the same tape-pool on the other server, because it works with the default management-class for that server ( where the pool name is defined). Is this correct ? So the only additional config to make (beneath defining the second copy-pool) is increasing the 'mount limit' in device-class 'server' on the one side where copy-pool is defined to the number of copy-pools I define ?
Thanks Christoph > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 07:47 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: server-to-server copy-pools > > Other server is related not to copy pool but to the device class. You have > only to define second pool over same devclass. > > Zlatko Krastev > IT Consultant > > > > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > > Subject: server-to-server copy-pools > > Hi all, > > today we have two servers connected via server-to-server. Both server have > defined their copy-pool on the other server. > I would like to split the copy-pool into two different ones. Reason is to > run stg-pool-backups in more than one session parallel.. > Does anybody know, if this is possible and how I can set up two different > copypools on a server, that are accessed via server-to-server connection > from one other server. > > Thanks for any help > > Christoph
