Hi , we backup from snapshosts on our Netapp-filer, therefore I do not see any errors in dsmsched.log. But i have the possibility to see at the filer console what files are locked and what kind of lock is made. There are about 3000 Outlookusers in our environment, but we have only about 400 pst -files locked. I think the difference comes from inactivity and a "auto-close-feature". The problem we had was a remote NT fileserver for about 100 Users and all with large pst files (100MB - 1GB). The incremental volume was around 5-6 GByte per night over a 2MBit line. Since we changed to subfilebackup (only for *.pst) we dropped to 1 GByte per night.
With Regards, Stefan Holzwarth > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Wholey, Joseph (TGA\MLOL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Juni 2002 17:48 > An: 'Stefan Holzwarth' > Betreff: RE: pst files > > > > Stefan, > > Are you sure they're not getting skipped? Check out your > dsmsched.log. If they're not getting skipped, what kind of > perfomance are you seeing? How many *.pst, how big? > > Regards, Joe > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Holzwarth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AW: pst files > > > Hi, > > as far as I know does Outlook himself closes the pst - files > after a while > being idle. > I have no trouble backing up pst files in our environment. > (we use Outlook 2000 SP1, pst files@Netapp filer) > (For remote pst-files we use successfully subfile backup.) > > Regards Stefan Holzwarth > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Peter Pijpelink - P.L.C.S. BV Storage Consultants > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Juni 2002 09:40 > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Re: pst files > > > > > > Hi people. > > > > look at www.tsmmediamanager.nl under support/tips there you > > can download > > the outlook killer program. (smile: I was wrong, we did not > > wrote this, > > Microsoft did) > > Seems Bill also makes suicide software for themselfs haha > > > > Greetings > > > > Peter > > > > At 12:11 10-06-2002 +0200, you wrote: > > >Hi > > > > > >We had this problem before. Our Outlook/Exchange users left > > their client > > >running over night, which first of all produced a lot of > errors, and > > >second of all made backups both take a long time, and also > > not backing up > > >open PST-files. > > > > > >The solution is to install St Bernard Open File Manager. > We have this > > >software running on two large fileservers containing both PST, and > > >PAB-files. Today, all files are backed up, and the backup > > time is a lot > > >faster. > > > > > >The installation of St Bernard is very easy, and requires a > > minimum of > > >time. > > > > > >Best Regards > > > > > >Daniel Sparrman > > >----------------------------------- > > >Daniel Sparrman > > >Exist i Stockholm AB > > >Propellerv�gen 6B > > >183 62 H�GERN�S > > >V�xel: 08 - 754 98 00 > > >Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >"Wholey, Joseph (TGA\\MLOL)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >2002-06-07 16:38 > > >Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > > > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > cc: > > > Subject: pst files > > > > > > > > >Why do *.pst files take so long to back up? Even those > > that are not in > > >use. Does anyone have a strategy to back them up in a > most efficient > > >manner? We have users that create multiple, large (gigs) > > >*.pst files and it's a requirement that we back them up. > > >
