I have just reciently tried the reclaim my onsite tape pool using a diskpool, and it works quite well. ... I will try the copypool now. .. Thanks for the hint! ... Jack
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tab Trepagnier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Reclaiming LTO Tapes > > Jack, > > It's been mentioned before, but if you use a disk pool for directories, > you should make the disk pool a FILE devclass. > > When my directory disk pool was DISK devclass, copypool reclamation would > launch and eight hours later I would have reclaimed a few tens of MBs. > > I rebuilt the directory disk pool as FILE devclass, and copy pool > reclamation proceeds at full speed from the start. > > Tab Trepagnier > TSM Administrator > Laitram Corporation > > > > > > > "Coats, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 07/03/2002 03:35 PM > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: Reclaiming LTO Tapes > > > I cannot find out how to speed me up either! Mine is slower than sin, > on reclaiming my offsite copypools especially. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Guillaume Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Reclaiminig LTO Tapes > > > Hey there > > Maybe its because I'm used to using STK 9840 tapes but yesterday I saw an > LTO tape at 25 % utilisation take almost 4 hours to reclaim, which to me > is > awful. How am I > supposed to reclaim my tapes with that kind of performance?. The drives I > use are IBM Ultriums in a 3584 library. With only 2 drives it makes it > hard > for users to do > restores... > > Are there any options I can change to make this go a bit faster. I know > the > start/stop on LTO's isn't good. > > Thanks for the help. > > Guillaume Gilbert > CGI Canada
