Ok, here is another one for you. I have a number of monthly schedules that ran on October 12th as they were supposed to. I usually change the date each month to make sure it runs on a Saturday but I had not gotten to them yet. Since they should run on November 12 if I leave it, nothing to worry about right now anyway. Think again, I had one of the monthly schedules kick off yesterday at 8PM. I verified the date is still set to 2002-10-12. How the hell did it pick that one and none of the rest???????????????????
I've already got 2 problems reported to IBM on this version, here is number 3. Guess I should have thought twice and just went with 5.1.1.6 instead. I guess I don't understand how the simplest things get by on the delivery. Why wouldn't this be part of a standard QA delivery test of the software before it's put up on the WEB for download? It sure looks like after a fix is made only the fixes are tested to make sure they work and nothing else. I know I'm not the only one frustrated here. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: <mailto:gillg@;saic.com> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
