Yes, I thought so too. What good is it if features come out and they don't work everywhere?
I don't recall anyone on the list mentioned this so I didn't think about it either. TSM Support just informed me that's why it's working on the 2 other drives and not this one. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154 > -----Original Message----- > From: Whitlow, Don [mailto:Don.Whitlow@;QG.COM] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Journaling > > I may be adding more questions than I am answering, but why should it matter > if a disk is SAN-based vs. DAS (local)? I would assume journaling would work > at the drive letter (logical) level, meaning it would be clueless as to the > underlying disk access method. To the O/S and software, it should just look > like a drive/volume. > > Maybe I'm missing something more to the puzzle. But I would think it would > work for you. > > Good luck > Don > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:GEOFFREY.L.GILL@;SAIC.COM] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Journaling > > > Ok I finally figured out why journaling is not working on this server. It's > because the 4 million plus files are on a SAN attached disk and journaling > does not support that, only local. > > What good is that????? Is there any good reason to use SAN disk these days > anyway? > Geoff Gill > TSM Administrator > NT Systems Support Engineer > SAIC > E-Mail: <mailto:gillg@;saic.com> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (858) 826-4062 > Pager: (877) 905-7154
