Regards, Daniel B.
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Sporer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: label/checkin libvolume Can't you just do a checkout with remove=no and then label the tapes? Jim Sporer At 01:16 PM 1/13/2003 -0800, you wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:58 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: label/checkin libvolume > > > > Well, TSM doesn't want to label them while they are PRIVATE > > and TSM doesn't > > really know what is going on... > > You might be able to do a del vol against them to get them > > back to scratch, > > then do your label libvol > >Dwight- > >Thank you for the reply. I did try deleting them, but they are not part >of a storage pool, so they cannot be "deleted" (and there is no "delete >libvolume" command). I updated a couple of the volumes to scratch, just >as a test. After updating them, I tried: "label libvol <LIBNAME> >search=yes checkl=barcode checkin=scr overwrite=yes >volrange=<vol1>,<vol2>". However, TSM reports 0 volumes labelled and >exits with "Success". > >The only other thing I can think to do is to go to the library and >physically remove them. Once removed, audit the library to show TSM that >they are no longer in the library. Then, load them back in and check them >in correctly. > >Any other ideas? Thanks. >Peter
