It would be helpful to see the entire output from the 'q inclexcl'
command, not just part of a single line. It would also be interesting to
see the output from a selective backup of one of these files, i.e.:
dsmc q inclexcl
dsmc s c:\somedir\saparch\somefile.txt
And include the *entire* output in your post.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
Richard Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/22/2003 12:08
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: NT exclude problem
> Do you have any include.dir lines in your option file? If you do,
> they override all excludes, no matter what their placement.
No, I don't have include.dir, only exclude and include statements.
> If you want to see what TSM thinks should be included or excluded,
> run dsmc q inclexcl
I tried that. It showed what I expected. My * or ? had been changed to a
#,
which I took to be TSMs own wildcard.
#:\...\saparch\...\*
But it still didn't work.
Richard Foster
Norsk Hydro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail with attached documents is only for the intended recipient
and may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any unauthorised reading, copying, disclosure or distribution of the
e-mail and/or attached documents is expressly forbidden, and may be a
criminal offence, and that Hydro shall not be liable for any action
taken by you based on the electronically transmitted information.
If you have received this e-mail by mistake, you are kindly requested
to immediately inform the sender thereof and delete the e-mail and
attached documents.
