We run a 4.2.3.2 TSM server under OS/390. We have about 110 active client systems, sending about 300,000 files and about 70 gigabytes to the server each night. Our best estimate is that this workload will double in the next two years. Is it reasonable to stay with an OS/390 or zOS server in the face of the projected growth? If so, how do we prove that the mainframe is up to the task? Most IT managers around here want to believe that the mainframe is the wrong choice for TSM or anything else.
- Re: Future of mainframe TSM Thomas Denier
- Re: Future of mainframe TSM Joshua S. Bassi
- Re: Future of mainframe TSM Miller, Ryan
- Future of mainframe TSM Sam Sheppard
- Re: Future of mainframe TSM Darby, Mark
- Re: Future of mainframe TSM Kraan, Helge van de
